Title: Benchmarking quantum mechanical methods for calculating reaction energies of reactions catalyzed by enzymes

Authors (5): J. Sirirak, N. Lawan, M. W. van der Kamp, J. N. Harvey, A. J. Mulholland

Themes: Biocatalysis (2020)

DOI: 10.7717/peerj-pchem.8

Citations: 12

Pub type: journal-article

To assess the accuracy of different quantum mechanical methods for biochemical modeling, the reaction energies of 20 small model reactions (chosen to represent chemical steps catalyzed by commonly studied enzymes) were calculated. The methods tested included several popular Density Functional Theory (DFT) functionals, second-order Møller Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and its spin-component scaled variant (SCS-MP2), and coupled cluster singles and doubles and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)). Different basis sets were tested. CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ results for all 20 reactions were used to benchmark the other methods. It was found that MP2 and SCS-MP2 reaction energy calculation results are similar in quality to CCSD(T) (mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.2 and 1.3 kcal mol−1, respectively). MP2 calculations gave a large error in one case, and are more subject to basis set effects, so in general SCS-MP2 calculations are a good choice when CCSD(T) calculations are not feasible. Results with different DFT functionals were of reasonably good quality (MAEs of 2.5–5.1 kcal mol−1), whereas popular semi-empirical methods (AM1, PM3, SCC-DFTB) gave much larger errors (MAEs of 11.6–14.6 kcal mol−1). These results should be useful in guiding methodological choices and assessing the accuracy of QM/MM calculations on enzyme-catalyzed reactions.

Name Description Publised
Supplemental Information 1: Molecular xyz coordinates Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020
Table S1: Coordinates of 29 molecules optimized at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d) level Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020
Table S2: Molecular energies of molecular No.1 (M1) to molecular No.29 (M29) (in kcal mol−1) calculated by 24 QM methods using the structure optimized at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d) level as starting structures Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020
Table S3: Reaction energies (in kcal mol−1) of reaction 1–20 calculated by 24 quantum mechanics methods Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020
Table S4: Errors of reaction energies (in kcal mol−1) of reaction 1–20, relative to the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ results Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020
Table S5: Mean signed errors, standard deviations, maximum errors and minimum errors along with their reaction number (Rxn No.) of reaction energies (in kcal mol<sup>−1</sup>) of reaction 1–20 Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020
Table S6: Absolute errors, mean absolute errors and standard deviations of reaction energies (in kcal mol−1) of reaction 1–20. The absolute errors are given relative to the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ results Related Article: Sirirak, Jitnapa, Lawan, Narin, Van der Kamp, Marc W., ... 2020


Back